Should Kenya worry about climate mitigation?
The entire African continent is estimated to be responsible
for just about five per cent of carbon dioxide emissions globally. The means
that Kenya’s contribution to this amount is less than one per cent and therefore
negligible. The question then arises: should developing countries like Kenya
worry about climate change mitigation?
From an earlier post, climate change mitigation was
described as being any effort intended at removing greenhouse gases (GHGs) already
in the atmosphere; or reducing the amount of GHGs being released into the
atmosphere by sources. The main sources of carbon dioxide, the most significant
greenhouse gas, are fossil fuels such as petroleum products and coal.
Efforts to reduce the amount of carbon dioxide the ends up in the atmosphere include replacing fossil fuels particularly petroleum products, coal and natural gas with renewable alternatives such as solar, wind, hydro or geothermal.
Other measures include construction of “green buildings”, where
natural light is used during daytime; where use of air conditioning is
minimised; and in which systems that automatically switch off lights when
people leave rooms or offices are installed.
These measures are important to adopt even in countries such
as Kenya that have contributed very little to current high levels of GHGs that
are already in the atmosphere.
Removal of carbon dioxide is mainly done by increasing green
cover, particularly through increasing the amount of land under forests. This
ensures that through the process of photosynthesis more plants, including sea
plants such as algae and sea weed, are available to remove atmospheric carbon
dioxide. These biological agents of capturing carbon namely forests,
grasslands, and other plants, including crops, shrub- and wood-lands and sea
plants are referred at as natural carbon sinks.
It should be noted that though Kenya is a developing
country, it aspires, through Vision 2030, to become a middle income country
with a good quality of life for its citizens by that time. This will mean
increased industrialisation to boost manufacturing and expansion of
infrastructure and other activities that will inevitably lead to increased
levels of carbon dioxide emission.
The expected surge in
energy demand needs to be handled strategically and in a manner that additional
emission of GHGs is minimised. According to the National Climate Change Action
Plan (NCCAP), Kenya aspires to follow a low carbon development pathway. The Plan notes: “Kenya has little historical or current
responsibility for global climate change, and emissions are low relative to
global emissions. Kenya’s low carbon climate resilient development pathway
recognises that national emissions will increase with population and economic
growth. However, the pathway can help ensure that Kenya remains a low emitter as
the country develops and takes steps to reduce vulnerability to climate change.”
The NCCAP therefore answers our
question above in the affirmative. Specific actions to reduce carbon emission
can be taken by each sector of development including agriculture by encouraging
practices such as agroforestry, where trees are intercropped with food and cash
crops, ensuring more tree cover to capture carbon dioxide.
In the energy sector, increasing the
proportion of renewable energy, particularly geothermal which is plentiful in
Kenya, would help reduce carbon emissions from fossil fuels while in transport,
development of urban mass transport systems would help reduce the use of
private cars to commute to work and therefore pollution and emissions that they
cause. Urban transport systems can use clean energy such as solar, further
reducing emissions.
In manufacturing, companies can be
encouraged to increase efficiency in energy use through practices such as
regular energy audits. Those using clean energy most efficiently can be given
incentives in order to continue reducing emissions hence encouraging others to
follow suit.
Fortunately, more than 190 countries
signed the 2015 Paris Agreement when rich countries, which are the world’s
highest polluters, indicated their intentions to support poorer countries to
strengthen climate change mitigation and adaptation programmes. Given that
increased emission of GHGs anywhere eventually affects all countries, Kenya
needs to play its part towards climate change mitigation even if others have
been historically responsible for current high levels of GHGs.
These countries, through the Paris
Agreement, have committed to help finance climate change adaptation programmes
so that developing countries can deal with the damage the rich countries have
been responsible for. The polluting countries at the same time have committed
to assign themselves targets for reducing emissions. This is why the Paris
Agreement is viewed as the strongest statement by the global community that
climate change has to be combated at all costs. The next post shall focus of
the Paris Agreement, including its fundamental weaknesses.
Comments