Climate change and conflict

In Kenya, climate change is predicted to result in increased frequency of extreme events, particularly droughts and floods. It has been noted that droughts in the East and Horn of Africa region used to occur after every 10 years between the 1960s and the 1970s. This frequency has increased to the extent that drought started occurring after every five years during the 1990s and could become even more frequent in the future due to climate change. In addition, droughts and floods have become more severe and rainfall less predictable due to the phenomenon.

More than 80 per cent of Kenya’s land mass is categorised as arid and semi-arid. All counties in the North of Kenya are in this category. The only sustainable livelihood activity that has been possible there is pastoralism. Communities that live in this region are therefore very dependent on natural climate-sensitive resources namely water, pasture and livestock.

Conflict: a consequence resource scarcity

As competition for these resources intensifies there have been increased incidents of conflict because neighbouring communities are forced to encroach each other’s territories in search of water and pasture, particularly during severe drought.

Turkana County provides a characteristic example of the link between climate change and conflict. Two communities namely, Turkanas and Pokots occupy the vast semi-arid county. For centuries incidents of cattle rustling happened sporadically between periods of drought and rainy seasons. However, such conflicts did not degenerate into full-fledged clashes because traditional mechanisms for conflict resolution were still effective. More recently however, climate induced resource scarcity has caused conflict to become more widespread, sometimes involving cross border skirmishes triggered by livestock raids.

Climate related insecurity permeates most areas of pastoralists’ livelihoods. The need to escape conflict zones, particularly by women and children means that children cannot attend school at the height of these hostilities. Teachers, particularly those coming from non-native communities, are often reported to desert their schools for fear of attacks creating serious disruption of the operations of the affected schools and undermining education potential of these already marginalised communities.

Conflict and climate change adaptation

Due to the possibility that inter-tribal or inter-clan conflict is often attributed to cultural practices, conflict resolution has not generally featured as being important in enhancing the capacities of pastoralist communities to adapt to climate change.

A landmark study by social anthropologist Dado Wario and colleagues published in theJournal of Peace Research in 2012 showed a strong relationship between scarcity of natural resources, particularly water and pasture in the drylands of Northern Kenya and conflict. Titled: Climate change, violent conflict and local institutions in Kenya's drylands, the study linked conflict to natural resource scarcity, citing climate change as one of the drivers of conflict.

It also alluded to the role of violence, including that which is triggered by the negative impacts of climate change to increased vulnerability of affected communities. It noted: “Violence and insecurity reduce people’s capacity to cope with drought, to educate their children properly, to market their goods and to use land intensively and effectively.”

Interestingly, one of the case studies featured in the study showed that traditionally, conflict is highest during months of sustained rainfall contrary to popular belief that conflict has always escalated during droughts. The stress caused by drought traditionally resulted in better cooperation and harmony between communities since they used available resources equitably to ensure their survival. During sustained wet seasons, livestock recovers as water and pasture become abundant. As a result young energetic “warriors” who are needed to trek and graze animals to far off places during drought become idle. They are therefore available to be recruited in carrying out livestock raids.

With climate change however this traditional pattern appears to be changing with the result that conflict is now increasingly fuelled by prolonged scarcity because wet seasons are becoming shorter and shorter. Conflict under these circumstances demands different approaches to resolve.

Recognising conflict resolution as an adaptation strategy might be what is required so that traditional structures that ensured resources were equitably shared during period of scarcity can be combined with modern approaches to climate change adaptation. This would ensure more efficient and equitable usage of natural resources in a changing climate, leading to more shared benefits and sustainable livelihoods in the drylands.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Health and benefits of clean energy to climate mitigation

Any action taken in order to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs) constitutes climate change mitigation. One might however ask: What can we do as individuals and at the household level in order to reduce the emission of GHGs? The answer and the action that can be taken are surprisingly simple. For example, the mere act of replacing a conventional electric bulb with an energy saving substitute amounts to a big contribution towards mitigation. It does not only reduce emissions but also significantly saves energy and by extension the cost of lighting homes. Consider this: although an energy saving bulb might cost three times the cost of an ordinary incandescent bulb, it lasts 10 times longer on average. With regard to mitigation against climate change the energy saving bulb has been found to help to prevent 100 kilogrammes of CO 2 per year over its working life of approximately 10,000 hours. In order to increase the benefits of clean energy even further, government...
Read more

The Government should urgently repossess all riparian land

  Much as the forced displacement of people who have settled along riparian land in Nairobi is painful to those being forced out, it is a necessary measure to make right mistakes that have been made over the years due to poor leadership. No settlement should be allowed on riparian land. Period. One of the main reasons for this is now plain for all to see. Water follows its natural drainage course no matter what may have been erected along natural waterways. Obviously, the heavier the rainfall the more forceful the water and the more damage it causes, the most serious of which is unnecessary loss of human life. Time has, therefore, come for Kenya’s leadership to determine how much distance from a water body should be considered riparian land based on expert advice. Once this is done, this land must be left unsettled and allowed to regenerate naturally and human settlement or cultivation permanently prevented. Current measures being taken to remove people from riparian land in Nair...
Read more

Ruto’s provocative but timely maiden UN General Assembly speech was spot on

President William Ruto’s inaugural address to the 77 th Session of the UN General Assembly was bold, unapologetic and crystal clear. It focused on major issues bedevilling countries in the Global South and how the problems are directly related to the state of multilateral relations between rich nations in the Global North and poor countries in the South. Importantly, the speech drew particular attention to climate change at a time when much of the world has experienced the worst ramifications of its negative impact. These have included heat waves in much of Western Europe over the June to August 2022 period, mega-droughts in the US south-west and mountain west, leading to almost uncontrollable forest fires, heatwaves and dangerously low levels of moisture and fresh water across numerous states and neighbouring countries including Canada and Mexico. Most recently, the world watched in horror as the worst level of flooding ever witnessed in the country put large swathes of Pakistan ...
Read more